What does Doublethink over GCSB spying say about NZ priorities

Letter to editor (Press and DomPost) in March about GCSB spying on our Island nations. It asks the question as to the public's priorities in light of their 'doublethink'.

The Editor, The Press, Christchurch
16 March, 2015

Dear Editor,

Doublethink has become the norm in relation to Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) spying and has developed in stages roughly like this: 1. The government denies that the GCSB is spying on New Zealanders or Pacific islands countries. 2. Irrefutable proof is produced that they are spying, such as from Nicky Hager or Edward Snowden. 3. The government then says, of course the GCSB has been spying, there was never any secret about that, and it is in the interests of (so called) ‘national security’. 4. Most everyone forgets, or pretends to forget, there was ever a denial (stage 1).

What is ‘security’ in the government’s view that allows them to spy this widely? It’s not protecting against so called ‘terrorism’. It’s not protecting NZ jobs of the ‘living wage’ variety. It’s about protecting the interests of those few individuals and corporations which have the best opportunity to gain and hold onto the greatest wealth (the 1%), and in general to protect the ability of the consumer economy to continue to exploit national and global natural ecologies. How do the people of NZ view their interests in this regard and how does that influence their doublethink?

Richard Keller

13 Endeavour St.
Wellington 6022


Commenting has now closed on this article.

The Indymedia Network

Latin America
United States
East Asia
South Asia
West Asia