“The dream is over”- Paula Bennett

If tax cuts that favour the wealthy, an increase in GST, employment law changes, education reform, possible moves on public housing weren't enough for you, the National/ACT coalition has set its sights on fundamental changes to the welfare system.
This process has started with the creation of the Welfare Working Group, in its own words designed to;
"The Welfare Working Group was established to undertake an expansive and fundamental review of New Zealand’s welfare system. The Group’s primary task is to identify how to reduce long-term welfare dependency."
It has been widely speculated that the purpose of the working group is to make recommendations in line with National/Act desires for welfare reform. Evidence of this can be seen in the members chosen for the working group, hand picked by Paula Bennet incidentally.
Alternative Welfare Working Group | Jobless, Homeless, Clueless
From the Standard;
- “The Welfare Working Group was handpicked by Paula Bennett and is stuffed with rightwing ideologies – most importantly Chair Paula Rebstock and former ACT President Catherine Isaac. They were always going to present a paper that attempts to create an air of crisis around welfare and undermines its legitimacy by claiming that beneficiaries are all bludgers (the same approach National is using on state housing and ACC). And that’s exactly what this report does.”
The findings of the report are predictable;
“Most people on a benefit have little or no focus on paid work, with a growing number “locked into” the system for years. ” And, according to Ms Rebstock, “we have concluded the current benefit system ignores the importance of paid work to the well-being of New Zealanders,”(1)
In response to the government working group, the Alternative Welfare Working Group was set up in July and has been holding a series of public meetings around the country to hear what people and groups most affected by the proposed reforms have to say on these issues. Upcoming meetings can be seen here.
Proposed welfare reform comes at a time when people need social safety nets the most. It amounts to a collective kick in the teeth to the poor. The climate of beneficiary bashing essentially blames people on benefits for ongoing financial difficulties, a crisis caused by the wealthy who not long ago were received their own generous bailouts from the public. There are over quarter of a million jobless in this country(the unemployed plus those who have given up actively looking for a job) and another 100,000 who want more hours than they can get.(2) It does not make sense to subject people on the Invalids and DPB to 'work-testing' programs in this competitive work environment.
The National/Act government is engaging in deliberate and calculated class war. Attacks on workers rights and the unemployed are a major part of this and should be fought against collectively. Like labour reform and mining on conservation land, the government seems to be testing the waters on this issue and it is up to us to make enough noise to stop it.



Comments
The nightmare begins!
Good article. The Welfare Working Group is an example of how this tory government engages in 'consultation by stealth'. Instead of holding public meetings on welfare reform, the group invited a few people, who were mainly employers, academics and Ministry of Social Development 'Yes-Men' to a three day forum at Victoria University. No left-wing groups were invited, although a few individuals from BAFNZ (The Beneficiary Advocacy Federation of New Zealand) and others attended. Then members of the WWG met with a selected number of groups around the country, by invitation. The only person in the WWG who has actually worked with beneficiaries is Enid Ratahi Pryor.
What the group did was in line with the main principle of the Social Security Act, which was amended with little opposition in 2007, from 'Welfare' to 'Work'. So instead of 'an expansive and fundamental review of New Zealand’s welfare system', the WWG was formed to find ways to force all beneficiaries to look for unsuitable work. They chose to undermind or down play any contrary evidence, such as; the fact that New Zealand has one of the better social welfare systems in the OECD, with the exceptions of the recent steep growth in youth and child poverty, and that New Zealand has one of the best superannuation schemes in the world; or that there are a number of beneficiaries, who mostly for reasons beyond their control, will never be able to take on or maintain a permanent fulltime job.
Very little, of any, money has been spent by the government in providing new job creation schemes, low cost child care or support for employees with disabilities. Instead, any beneficiaries who successfully find employment will be put on to a 90 Day probationary trial.
This is the nat party
This is the nat party operating with restraint btw. Term two begins when they win the next election (Labour cannot win with Goff) where they will be taking the gloves off...Rogernomics/Ruthenasia on crack.
(Labour cannot win with Goff)
At least Goff has one redeeming feature then . . .
To elaborate, any capitalist government will try to make the economy more business-friendly in a period of recession (or near-recession) such as we are in. It is not an issue of "the nat party operating with restraint" or "taking the gloves off...Rogernomics/Ruthenasia on crack". It's just capitalism in its normal mode. The problem is that most people, even people too young to remember it, think of the long post-war boom (late 40s to early 70s) as normality and periods of significant and/or frequent bust as aberrations. History would suggest otherwise. Right through the 19th century and up to WWII, recessions were frequent, deep, and quite regular. Periods of relative affluence for workers have been the exception, not the rule. We are probably in for a few decades of weak boom and recurrent bust. It is only when people get that reality that they will start to act. And Labour will not be part of the solution. Pinning hope on them ameliorating the situation is an obstacle to getting the job done, which is to ditch the current system and build a better one. Labour are a big part of the problem, not in any way part of the solution.
Cheers,
John
Employed/ beneficiary solidarity
"Welfare dependency". 'People are addicted to being well. If we could convince them to put up with being sick, hungry, and miserable more of the time, it would save money, and the rich could get that little slice richer. Let's make it happen.' Grrr
The links between these attacks on beneficiaries and the attacks on workers (Fire At Will Bill atc) are crystal clear. Together, these two will act as a pincer, squeezing the working poor into ever more insecure economic conditions, as they are bounced back and forth between 90 day work trials and benefits which are increasingly more difficuly to get, and to live on.
I'd really like to see beneficiary support groups get more involved in the campaign against the Fire At Will Bill, speaking at the rallies, mobilising their supporters to support 'name and shame' pickets etc. Similarly, I'd like to see the unions more involved in the campaign to defend social welfare.
A recent Listener article reports on new research in evolutionary biology which suggests that many of our social problems, especially teenage motherhood and absent fatherhood, can be directly attributed to instinctive strategies for surviving poverty. This is not news to those of us who have compared the birthrates and child survival rates in poorer countries, to those in richer countries. Perhaps the Welfare Wrecking Group ought to have read the Spirit Level as part of their research?
http://www.ideasfestival.co.uk/?page_id=485
Locked in here - locked in there
What Paula Bennett and her National mates want is to replace people being "locked into" the welfare system by having them "locked into" low paid employment contracts. It is an agenda so typical for National. They look after their most loyal supporters and clientele, who are the business owners and operators. So naturally anything that serves their interest will always be top at the of the agenda for National.
We only need to look at the way they "increased" the minimum wage by 25 cents earlier this year. Truth is they would even like to reduce the minimum wage again, but because it would be quite unpopular they do not dare to go that far.
The 90 day trial period is another instrument that the employers love to take advantage of. It will be the lower skilled and easily replaced workers that will suffer the most under it.
Any employer could easily judge after say 4 weeks of employment whether a staff member is fit for doing a job and can work within a team of co-workers. So why have a 90 day trial period? The reason is clear. It gives the bosses a longer period of suppressing new staff by being able to remind them that they are "on trial". That way insecurity is used to intimidate workers.
While there were 2,700 applicants for only about 150 jobs at a supermarket in Mt Roskill, Auckland, a few weeks ago, one has to wonder how the government can justify putting even more pressure on the sick, sole parents and otherwise powerless members of society.
What is the sense of work-testing sickness and invalids beneficiaries in the present economic climate.
So it is as clear as a polished crystal that these measures are simply being implemented because once again National wants to cater for its supporters.
Paula Bennett - you make a masochist have endless wet dreams! Once you enjoyed the benefit system to look after your child, now you turn against the very people that are in the situation you were once in. Thank you for limiting the Trading Incentive Allowance, it is another good measure to ensure more dumbing down of this country that seems to be doomed to remain a low skilled, low trained and low wage economy.
You will head off to the US shortly on paid study leave (I hear you get $ 5000 a week) while others are struggling to make ends meet and denied a fairer chance to do sensible studies above level 3. I suggest you stay out of this country for good and don't ever come back to the shores of Aotearoa! I suggest your Ministerial salary gets used to fund something like pre-school education instead of being wasted on a totally unsympathetic, hypocritical and mean-spirited leader like you.
pandora
Thank you very much for find so many good things, it's benefit. Is really appreciate it. Hope you will become better and better.
lala...<strong><a
lala...<strong><a href="http://www.shoppanjewellery.com/">pandora</a></strong>
http://www.shoppanjewellery.com/