Revised Search and Surveillance Bill still fundamentally flawed

in

pic

“There will be an urgent public meeting on Monday 30 August at 7pm at St Joseph's Church (Basin Reserve) in Wellington to address the just returned Search and Surveillance Bill. An interim report on the Search and Surveillance Bill was issued by the Justice and Electoral Select Committee last week. The report is an admission that the bill will confer enormous new powers onto approximately 70 government agencies,” said Campaign Spokesperson Batch Hales.

“The report confirms that police will get a load of new powers: video surveillance where police trespass onto private property will be made legal; the circumstances in which audio bugging will be legal will be dramatically increased from what it is at present. The threshold for warrantless searches is being lowered, as are the circumstances for setting up roadblocks.”

Links   Select Committee Backs Police Spycams  |  Stop the Search and Surveillance Bill

“Speakers at the public meeting will be Michael Bott from the Council for Civil Liberties speaking against the bill next to Select Committee chairman Chester Burrows, government MP for Whanganui, who will be there to try and justify the vast expansion of state power. At the meeting, the Campaign group will be urging people to make submissions and get involved in political action on the streets to stop the bill.”

“Despite the modifications to the bill, the fundamental issues remain. It makes on-going 24-hour-a- day surveillance equivalent to a one-off search. Secondly, the bill makes video and audio surveillance the first and
primary means of law enforcement and crime solving. The current law says that audio surveillance can be utilized effectively as a last resort when other methods have not worked or are not available. The privacy
implications for ordinary people from video and audio surveillance are profound.

Thirdly, the bill makes no differentiation between video and audio surveillance. Again, most people would not agree with that conclusion. The old adage, ‘A picture speaks a thousand words’ illustrates well why video
surveillance is indeed a far greater invasion of privacy than audio surveillance. It is without hyperbole to say that legalising police trespass to install video surveillance would be ushering ‘Big Brother’ into people’s living rooms.”

ENDS

For more information, check out our website http://www.stopthebillnow.blogspot.com or email us at stopthebillnow@gmail.com

 

Comments

Justice Minister Simon Power

Justice Minister Simon Power today announced Cabinet has approved recommendations to amends parts of the legislation, following an interim report from the justice and electoral select committee.

He said the changes would better protect human rights.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/4032523/Surveillance-legislation-softened

It really doesn't protect anything at all...

If you have a good read of much of the 442 page report they produced (I've only managed to completely read the first 57 pages), you realise very quickly that the suggested changes protect nothing at all.  The greater recognition of human rights is really just a toothless 'purpose' statement that guarantees nothing.  Most of the other restrictions they have added are equally weak and are designed to sooth discontent while keeping the main idea of the bill intact.