Waihopai trial update

in

The three Ploughshares activists accused of popping the dome at the Waihopai spybase in April 2008 began the arduous journey through a defended hearing today. The three, Sam Land, Adi Leason and Father Peter Nurmane each face three charges: 1 of burglary and two of intentional damage. A colourful solidarity vigil and march preceded the start of court this morning with a hundred + supporters and comrades showing their solidarity.

A jury was impaneled and the Crown opened by outlining the elements of each charge that must be made, beyond a reasonable doubt, in order for a conviction on each charge (e.g. the jury will render a total of 9 verdicts).

On the intentional damage charge the crown must prove:

  1. That they destroyed or damaged property
  2. That they did so intentionally or recklessly
  3. That they did so without ‘claim of right’ (e.g. that they believed it was legal to do so)
  4. That they had no interest in the property (e.g. a legal interest in it)

On the burglary charge, the crown must prove:

  1. They entered an enclosed yard
  2. That they had no authority to do so
  3. They intended to commit an offence.

 In the court, Father Peter is representing himself, while Sam Land is represented by Antony Shaw and Adi Leason by Mike Knowles. All three gave impassioned opening statements about the immediate necessity of disarming Waihopai as a contributor the human death and suffering in the so-called ‘war on terrorism’.  

In his statement Father Peter said that it was necessary because:

  1. Human life was in danger in foreign lands
  2. That the 3 had a ‘claim of right’ to the action
  3. That democracy and free process were not allowed in terms of foreign intelligence gathering, thus there was no other means available to them to remedy the situation

It appears that the ‘owners’ of the spybase will not be fronting up as the crown case consists solely of 8 witnesses: 1 security guard at the base and 7 cops. It will  be interesting to see how they can maintain a charge of damage when it appears no one is willing to claim ownership of the premises.

The trial is in courtroom 3 of the Wellington District Court – it is open to the public so please come down to show your support for these courageous people.

The case is set down for 8 days, and there are a wide variety of solidarity activities going on all week. Check out www.converge.org.nz/pma for details of all events.

 

 

Comments

It's so great to have people

It's so great to have people like the Ploughshares activists out there taking a positive stand against so much injustice. Kai Kaha!

one charge to beat?

So, if they get off the "intentional damage" charge, they pretty much automatically get off the "burglary"? Since they committed what they intended to commit, and if it wasn't an offence...

Conviction on both counts is

Conviction on both counts is inevitable. Their "defence of others" is interesting but will probably fail because they won't be able to prove that deflating the dome would save others from physical harm. Custodial sentences are likely because of the dollar value of the damage they caused.

If they wanted to properly defend themselves they would have each denied deflating the dome, saying it was one of the others, and denied knowing that the purpose of breaking into the site was to deflate the dome. That way the Crown would have difficulty proving "beyond reasonable doubt" who exactly deflated the dome and that they entered the premises with the intention committing a crime.

But this whole thing is not about a proper defence. It's about martyring themselves to their followers, basking in the media spotlight and bringing attention to their cause.

If they knew what they were getting themselves into, then its admirable. If not, then... jail is no joke.

Not Guilty finding

Well it is amazing when activists decide to try and convince a Jury of their convictions - which is part of the Ploughshares strategy.  In this case - as in several other international cases it has proven 'successful'.

All three have been found 'not guilty'.

solidarity from dunedin

My thoughts and prayers are with you. Thank you for your clear and courageous stand.

Blessed are the peace-makers.

Tuesday Update

Just a quick update from Tuesday. Court didn't start until almost 3pm because judge and counsel had discussions in chamber.

Then Adrian took the stand and talked passionately about his life, his christian beliefs, his engagement in social issues, including his time in a slum dwelling in Thailand. He then went on to talk about the war in Afghanistan, the war in Iraq and NZs contribution to it via the Waihopai spy base. Just as he went into details of the Echelon system, the power went out and court was adjourned. I left at this stage, so I don't know what happened in the last 20 or so minutes of court.

The judge seemed quite accomodating and allowed Adrian to talk at length about his motives.