The United Nations and the October15 activist raids.

in

What was the prudent information that lead to the raids being actioned yesterday, October 15? And what is the connection between the United nations and these raids?

On 14 September 2007, New Zealand was one of only four nations to vote against the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, speaking against the declaration just prior to the vote.

The landmark declaration, approved after 143 Member States voted in favour, outlines the rights of the world’s estimated 370 million indigenous people and outlaws discrimination against them – a move that followed more than two decades of debate.

The Declaration emphasizes the rights of indigenous peoples to maintain and strengthen their own institutions, cultures and traditions and to pursue their development in keeping with their own needs and aspirations.

It also prohibits discrimination against indigenous peoples and promotes their full and effective participation in all matters that concern them, and their right to remain distinct and to pursue their own visions of economic and social development.

In other words, the declaration gives the weight of the United Nations to the notions of Tino Rangatiratanga and Mana Motuhake.

But how is this connected with the October 15 raids?

Well, Ngai Tuhoe have a claim before the Waitangi Tribunal for their ancestral land. Land that was never ceeded to the crown. Ngai Tuhoe did not sign Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and the land that is now in crown hands was stolen. Submissions on the claim closed in 2005 and the report on their claim is expected back at the end of 2007.

There is no moral or law (domestic or international) which can justify the crowns continued possession of the Tuhoe nation. By the occupation of Tuhoe land, the NZ Government imposes a pakeha colonial system of taxation, schooling, education and health upon Ngai Tuhoe. And these systems have been shown again and again to be failing Maori.

What the new UN Declaration sets out, what the Waitangi Tribunal must find, what justice should prove, is that these lands, the control of their communities, the Mana Motuhake, of Tuhoe must be returned.

Of course, the government is not prepared to allow an alternate system to exist within our national boundaries. They are not willing to admit to the heinous wrongs of our predecessors, and they are not willing to return these lands, and Tino Rangatiratanga, to it's rightful heirs.

THIS is why there must be a fight for the rights of the Tuhoe nation, THIS is why, in my opinion, the police and government decided to act now - to cast a light of their making ("terrorists") upon those people who are brave enough to stand up for the justice for which the Tuhoe nation has been waiting so long.

KIA KAHA FREEDOM FIGHTERS
ME WHAWHAI MO TE TIKA!

Links:

NZ votes against indigenous peoples' rights at the UN as Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples is adopted by overwhelming majority
http://www.converge.org.nz/pma/in140907.htm

Tuhoe claims at the Waitangi tribunal
http://www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz/resources/urewera_panui.asp

Comments

Re: The United Nations and the October15 activist raids.

Whats happening with the articles , NZSIS or Helen/Ro Marks corrupting them ????lets us know???

Re: The United Nations and the October15 activist raids.

Whats happening with the articles , NZSIS or Helen/Ron Marks corrupting them ????lets us know???

Re: The United Nations and the October15 activist raids.

As far as i'm aware the UN'international declaration of human rights' supposedly ensures the rights of indigenous people to these very things already, to which the new zealand government is a signatory. The rights to self determination have long been agreed to on paper.
The fact that the UN has come up with another document for governments to sign in support of these 'rights' just highlights the fact that however many documents government representatives
put their names to they remain meaningless when a lack of actioning ensues, or worse still action against their 'principles' follows.I personally do not believe in representative democracy, and if anyone in government truly did then they would be both arrogant AND foolish. That they refused to sign the agreement they are now bound to along with the countries our main international 'security/information' sharing agreements are with , who are also countries with long histories of oppression of indigeous people, and at once continue to act against previous agreements, just further points to their priorities to work together against anyone opposing their agenda. We have to look out for each other and fight for what we believe in regardless of them. They will do what they can in law and on the streets to stop us from sharing our ideas, banding together and being effective. They highlight their hypocrisy every day.There will always be more of us!
Kia Kaha people!!!

Re: Re: The United Nations and the October15 activist raids.

And theres plenty of us to put up with your crap and put you in your place. You want equal rights, or anything along those line, and expect to get away with being nothing less than terrorists? I bet if there was some kind of KKK secret training camp where they taught people to shoot the likes of you, you would be up in arms as much as the rest of New Zealand is with you lot. You highlight your hypocrisy every day. There will always be more of us

Re: Re: Re: The United Nations and the October15 activist raids.

As a NZ born person of European descent, I always knew there were rednecks out there.....get an education and actually learn the whole history of this country, not the government sanitised version...the law should apply equally to all but you seem to forget that...You belong in South Africa

Re: Re: Re: Re: The United Nations and the October15 activist ra

The indigenous population (Maori's, but saying this is considered racist if you are Caucasian if your premise is in a negative light) can whine and moan as much as they deem necessary about the past, but it doesn't matter!
We are in the now, and we are looking to the future, and I for one, would not liked to be denied permission to access for any Maori owned land simply because I am Caucasian. It all ready happens, and the recent events only highlights it more; Im not sure if you saw the news the other day, but only 'Maori' reporters were allowed to report on the land, and the rest were treated with open hostilities. That is RACISM. Now I bet you will all whine about how you are oppressed, and thus your racism is valid, but its still racism, and you cant expect 'us' (as in the people you are racist to) to be accommodating in the face of such blatant two-faced behavior. I am Caucasian, I grew up in a predominantly Polynesian environment (Otahuhu for the record), and I genuinely hold no racial discontent towards ANYONE of a different colour skin. Taking away land from the public (as in everyones land) to give to a minority (indigenous or not, you are still a minority) to which they will make exclusive to only people of the same decent is not FAIR for the future of New Zealand, and EVERYONE that calls it home.

Re: The United Nations and the October15 activist raids.

What the hell? Grow the fuck up nobody cares about your claim to the land, the only thing they care about is you wanting to become "freedom fighters" a.k.a terrorists.

Re: The United Nations and the October15 activist raids.

If some the non indigneous people actually took time out to study history properly and the true history of this country, they might be actually suprised at the wrongs that were committed in the past.

As a person with Dutch parentage and having lived and worked in the Tuhoe tribal area, I know that what has been going on for the last 150+ years will not be sorted out the way the currnet government is trying to do things. I thought this country was supposed to be a democracy. I suppose by posting these comments, I will be branded a terrorist or traitor to the crown. This government is known making law to suit themselves, just look at what happened when Harry Dynhoven had a Dutch passport and would have been unable to be a MP, they changed the law retrospectivley to keep themselves in power, and who can forget the nearly 1 million dollars over spend at the last elections, again the law was changed to suit themselves. The word Terrorist was only used because the the police used the Terrorism Suppresion Act, but yet no charges have been laid under that Act. I would be very suprised if any charges were even laid under this act. Time will tell and when the court cases have bee held, all the information is out in public and not suppressed by the courts, we can all make balanced and informed decisions. Kia Kaha to the the Iwi and Hapu of Tuhoe