A Tale of Two Protests

in

There were two protests in Wellington Tuesday 17 October. I managed to make it to both of them.

Clean Start for Cleaners

Today is international anti-poverty day (a concept I find a little weird - today we'll have international anti-poverty day - tomorrow we'll go back to ignoring international poverty). The Clean Start for Cleaners campaign organised rallies in Australia and New Zealand today, which is appropriate because to be a cleaner is to live in poverty.

All around the world Cleaners are mostly immigrant and indigenous women. Despite the fact that cleaning needs to be done everywhere, everday and it is completely devalued. The union rate for commercial cleaners is just 70 cents an hour above minimum wage. Cleaners work two or three jobs to get their hours up and have no security of employment. Subcontracting makes it so hard for cleaners to fight for better wages and conditions, because the employer can always hire someone else.

All these points were made at the rally, of course. Plus some interesting facts I didn't know (90,000 workers got a pay increase when the minimum wage went up -60,000 of them were women - low-wages, poverty and capitalism are all feminist issues). The most powerful speakers were cleaners themselves. There is no service recognition for cleaners, so two women who had cleaned for forty years were still only getting $10.95 an hour. Another woman spoke angrily about always being blamed for being a burden on the tax-payer because she got government assistance - even though she worked over 40 hours a week - she is blamed rather than the employer who won't pay a living wage.

One of the women also talked about being involved in previous cleaning struggles, and strikes. It must be so hard to have struggled and won, but seen the victory slowly eroded over the last twenty years. Particularly as you'd know that if anything was going to get better you need to fight that fight again.

Now I have some problems with the Clean Start campaign - most notably that no-one really understands what its principles are (and last I heard these principles haven't actually been translated into the first language of many of the cleaners). But I was really glad to be at this rally, in support of the cleaners.

(Part of my good feeling towards this protest is because I left before Ruth Dyson - (minister of labour) spoke. I needed to get to the other protest, and if you've heard Ruth Dyson say once that she'd like to change things, but she can't - you've heard it once too many times).

Arms Trade! Death Trade!

Different people observe the changing seasons in different ways. For gardeners spring means planting things, for sports fans it means the beginning of the cricket season,* for students spring means avoiding studying for exams, and for Wellington activists spring is celebrated by protesting the conference of the New Zealand Defence Industry Association.

Every year the New Zealand Defence Industry Association holds a forum. To quote from their website:

NZDIA organises the New Zealand Defence Seminars, generally held annually in October/November. This Seminar brings together Australian and New Zealand commercial companies, Asian, Australian and New Zealand Defence purchasing interests together with high level New Zealand Ministerial involvement.

Isn't nice that they manage to leave off references to the purpose of the 'defence' industry is to kill people, and the current wars.

Now obviously on a global scale New Zealand arms trade is insignificant. One of the members of the NZDIA makes grenates in his garage. But that doesn't make them any less repsonsible for the products they produce. Rakon (while not part of NZDIA), is the most used example of a New Zealand company that makes products to kill people. Their GPS crystals are used in US made Smart bombs, some of which were dropped on Palestine and Lebanon this year (more here.

For the last few years the Defence industry has been held at Te Papa (New Zealand's national museum. This has angered some people even more - Te Papa's branding is 'Our Place.** The Defence Industry conference has become one of the focal points of peace organisation, the other being the war against Iraq. Organising against the New Zealand defence industry brings the links between capitalism and war home.

I've been protesting the defence industry conference since 2001. I have to admit that I haven't had a huge amount of enthusiasm for the protests for the last few years. You organise small protests at things year after year, and in the end you just don't have the energy to do it again.

So I can say that yesterday's protest was truly fantastic without blowing my own trumpet (all I did was turn up).

The police were really worried about protesters and had put up blockades all around Te Papa. This made it really easy for protesters outside each entrance to stop those going to the conference getting in or out. There were over 200 people there for most of the afternoon (people came and went), and every entrance to Te Papa was blockaded

In order for this to work the police closed the museum for the afternoon. Which shows where the priorities are, it's more important that the weapons conference goes ahead than that people can actually use the museum.

What was really amazing about the protests was that no-one got arrested. The trick at a protest is to know your strength. The vast majority of people who have been arrested on protests I've been at have got off - they hadn't done anything wrong. But police arrest people on protests because they can - if the crowd is big enough they don't arrest anyone because it'll just make more trouble. It's often really hard to judge your strength - I'm always very cautious. But this time people knew exactly when to back down - when we were weakening. It was an incredibly well organised and effective action.

*Or not - I could be wrong about either of these facts, since I know slightly more about sports than I do about gardening.

** Personally I don't think it matters that much where it's held and I occasionally find the arguments against it being held at Te Papa a little bit precious. It's not like the museum doesn't have problems of its own: Women? Kind of absent. Work and the people who do it? Not so much. Struggle over these things? Five minutes in one film.

Comments

Re: A Tale of Two Protests

Thanks very much for this thoughtful analysis.

Re: A Tale of Two Protests

I don't agree with the proposition above that:
"nobody really understands what( CleanStart's) principles are".

The Clean Start "principles" have been critiqued on this site more than once, have been anylysed in The Spark and have been the the subject of a substantial ongoing debate in several issues of the Worker's Charter paper.

As a number of people are aware,the 10 "principles" are essentially a list of concessions to employers at the expense of cleaners. They include anti wildcat strike provisions and voluntary wage restraint. Why is a union putting such things forward? In the hope that they can gain greater union density by taking a step backwards.
As a working cleaner I am pissed off that these
" principles" are packaged in vague militant rhetoric and presented as some sort of a strategy for low paid workers.
The ill treatment of low paid cleaners is very real, but CleanStart is not. It is no more likely to advance their interests than the empty words of Ruth Dyson. I think it will take a real sustained well supported strike action on a cleaning site to start getting justice for cleaners.

Don Franks

Re: A Tale of Two Protests

I agree with the criticisms that have been discussed here. When I say no-one understands what the principles mean, I meant that there doesn't seem to be much relationship between those principles and the organising work which is being done (which sounds like standard and important organising work).

Re: A Tale of Two Protests

Too much of the organising work has been mobilising cleaners to assemble and listen to the words of Labour mps. This has been going on for years and years. Many hours at SFWU delegate conferences I've attended have been butchered by the parading of various Labour mps to speak to the workers. There, they have but three themes, to speak about themselves, to hold up National as a fearsome bogey to which they are the only alternative, or, as cited in the first post, to say they would like to help but can't. That is certainly standard present day union organising work, but it is important only to the perpetuation of the union office machine.
If this charade netted gains for the workers it might be defensible, but that is not the case. One of the cleaners spoke of victory being slowly eroded over the last 20 years and that's true. Years go by, many of them under Labour governments and the result of the present 'engagement' strategy is good careers for a few individuals while the mass of low paid workers real wages and conditions keep slipping back.
An early issue of the Workers Charter paper did much to expose this fraud by putting some blunt workers questions to former SFWU now Labour mps. The result was a wall of silence. It's high time for union leaders stop their wretched self serving pretence that Labour is 'worker friendly' and start putting the hard questions to Labour mps in front of the troops.

Don Franks